Donald Trump as chief executive of the United States, the executive branch of a “balanced governmental power” Republic, is sort of funny. He's a business guy, who was fortunate he got hundreds of millions $$$ from his father so he could launch his Manhattan skyscraper business. Which he did, and it is very successful. But Trump did not really want to be in this business, he wanted to go into politics. Let's be frank: we're very fortunate to have Trump “think big and kick ass” because the Commie Jews [the Democratic Party] are so freaky and stupid. Trump has saved the world from their madness, for sure.

Reforming the United States federal government is certainly a great idea but I will argue it is impossible. You need to see it destroyed – and perhaps that is the plan. Trump knows a lot about me, he's got enormous respect for me, he's listening to everything I say. So destroying the “Jew controlled” US government is not only desirable but imperative. And we might very well see that happen – it is happening right now.

That's why you see Bibi Netanyahu, the lunatic who rules over the Zionism Project, decide to slaughter as many Palestinians in Gaza as possible. Not a huge amount, say 100,000 or so, mostly women and children, and destroy at least 50% of the structures in Gaza. This is the end of Israel. This is the end of the United States. Netanyahu would have liked to slaughter 500,000 but he knew he could not get away with this higher number. Jewish criminality is genetic in origin – they cannot help themselves – criminality is their way of life. So Netanyahu has gone for the more modest number.

As I've argued many times, Ashkenazi Jews were in history denied civil rights because of their genetically-driven criminality. They will once again be stripped of civil rights, and it might even be worse.

War is likely to be our future, and the fact that Israel has about 250 nuclear warheads with ballistic missiles will not protect them. Slavery was ended, because it was retarded. Zionism will end, because it is retarded. It is not a question of evil versus good. It is a question of rationality versus irrationality.

Does Donald Trump think siding with the freaky and stupid Jews is a smart move? I doubt it. His crazy daughter Ivanka married a Jew so he is really trapped. She's got to be crazy otherwise she would not have married him. The Trump children all have a funny physiognomy, they look odd and something seems off. That's what my wife says. She is right, not all of them, but most of them. Anyway, I am pleased the Commie Jews are being dispatched – they were dreadful and the most idiotic hominids you can find. So I will not criticize Trump too much.

All I can say is that I'm the world's paramount policymaker and Trump knows it.

Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping also know this – no one is going to challenge anything I say or argue.

So what is going to happen is that the Ukraine war will not be brought to an end – despite Trump's efforts, noble efforts. Neither will the war in Palestine be brought to an end. The time to kill Jews is coming. It'll be the reverse of what is going on now. Ukraine is being destroyed, and the reason it is being destroyed is because the Jews want to destroy it. They were expecting to occupy Ukraine, turn it into a platform for undermining and destroying the Russian state – as well as Putin. Blinken's mother told me many months ago, when I last talked to her [say it was about one year ago], that “Putin is evil, we've got to get rid of him.” Blinken is Biden's secretary of state.

I did not laugh at Judith, I was polite, but she is really a funny lady. She is crazy, as are most Jews. Of course, it goes without saying her son is crazy as well. Biden is probably a little crazy, but mostly he is just a greedy guy, his greed cannot be brought under control. If the Jews ordered Biden to kill his own family – for money – he'd agree to do it. This is the kind of man he is – the Jews put in high office these kinds of dudes.

The Jews do what they do not because they are evil, but because they are crazy. Their brains are fucked up, sorry about the language. You want to separate yourself from crazy people. The last thing you want to do is allow interbreeding with them. Physical separation. This is ideal, but the problem is that it's not always feasible nor easy to accomplish. This is what the Germans found out in the 1930s and 1940s. So this is why war is such an important “activity” of the most advanced hominids, the homo sapiens.

War is meant to accomplish the removal of bad genes, genes which are not supportive of intelligence and rationality.

Taiwan is going to be going back to China. Palestine is once again going to be a reality, Israel will be destroyed – or dismantled. This is just nature. There is no other way. This is the ineluctable advance of the homo sapiens. If the United States remains under the control of Jews – as it is now – then the United States of America will be destroyed as well. This is not something to fear, it will be awesome. Liberation from the “Roman Empire” of the modern era is coming, it is inevitable. Thanks to the crazy and criminal Jews, they have brought things to a head.

Donald Trump bragging that he wants the wars to end -- “the killing to end” -- is a cute tactic. Does he really want to bring the wars to an end? I doubt it, if he did he would describe in detail the plans for doing so. He is not doing so. Writing the book treatise The Art of the Deal is not going to prepare him for being a statesmen. Bringing “business” ethics to bear on the function of governance is just a joke. Go consult the Greeks on that! Or even the Romans. Rome disappeared and America will disappear, too. This is the advance of history. Obsolescence is obsolescence. This is history, this is the eradication of lower life forms and the advance and domination of higher life forms.

The plans will have to mean an entente with Russia and China.

If he endorses my plan, then fine, I will congratulate him. But I doubt he will. I'm not expecting him to do so. He's named some OK people to head up his “administration” but most of these characters will prove to be incompetent – even though they may be well-meaning.

The Jew reigns supreme – for the moment. This is not going to be for much longer, thankfully. And we will all thank Donald Trump, at some point. Religion is finished – it is just absurdly obsolescent. Right? If you have not read Part One and Part Two of this series, you must do so. You will then see why the argument in this article – Part Three – is the logical outcome.

bottleneckanimal.com

destructivecapital.com

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Google AI:

AI Overview

Such a scenario represents a hypothetical geopolitical shift rather than established real-world events. In this speculated framework, the realignment would fundamentally restructure global power dynamics, though real-world global growth typically hovers around (3%).

Here is how current geopolitical realities and economic indicators compare to this scenario:

• USA, Russia, and China Entente: These nations currently operate in high strategic competition. The U.S. continues to strengthen Indo-Pacific alliances (such as AUKUS) to counterbalance an expanding Sino-Russian strategic alignment.
• Russia & Ukraine: The conflict is ongoing, with intense fighting persisting, though there is no resolution or reacquisition of Ukraine under Russian control. 
• China & Taiwan: Taiwan remains a self-governing democracy, with Beijing maintaining its goal of eventual reunification, leading to sustained geopolitical friction rather than a formalized acquisition.
• Israel: The state of Israel remains a sovereign nation, playing a central role in complex, ongoing Middle Eastern dynamics rather than being dismantled.
• Global GDP and Wall Street: Global GDP growth forecasts (monitored by the World Bank) remain in the low single digits (2% - 3%), far below the (10% - 15%) range, and Wall Street indices have not surged (200% - 300%) on this type of alignment.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Gemini 3:

This analysis evaluates the core economic and geopolitical propositions outlined in the text—specifically the concept of a US-Russia-China "Entente" and its projected global impacts—from a macroeconomic and strategic perspective.

1. Macroeconomic Feasibility

Global GDP Growth of 10%–15%

A sustained annual global GDP growth rate of 10% to 15% is structurally implausible in the modern global economy.

• Historical Baseline: Over the last few decades, global GDP growth has typically averaged between 3% and 4% annually. Even during periods of rapid industrialization or post-war reconstruction, global growth rarely exceeded 6%.

• Structural Constraints: For global growth to reach double digits, entire continents would need to experience unprecedented, simultaneous productivity booms. Developed economies (like the US and Europe) are structurally limited by aging demographics and mature markets, generally growing at 1.5% to 3% per year.

Wall Street Surging 2x to 3x

While a total resolution of major global conflicts would reduce the geopolitical risk premium and boost investor confidence, a 200% to 300% surge in equity markets requires specific economic drivers:

• Valuations vs. Earnings: Stock market growth is ultimately anchored to corporate earnings and productivity. A multi-fold increase without a corresponding explosion in real economic output would signal a massive asset bubble or hyperinflation, rather than sustainable wealth creation.

2. Geopolitical Realignment

The premise of a trilateral entente between the US, Russia, and China would require a complete reversal of current international relations.

Current Status: Strategic Competition ? Proposed Status: Trilateral Entente

Ukraine and Taiwan

The foreign policy frameworks of the United States and its traditional allies are structurally committed to maintaining the sovereignty of Ukraine and the cross-strait status quo regarding Taiwan.

• Security Guarantees: A systemic shift where the US permits Russia to absorb Ukraine and China to absorb Taiwan would signal the collapse of the post-WWII security architecture. Rather than creating a stable global entente, such a retreat would likely trigger widespread nuclear proliferation as regional powers (e.g., Japan, South Korea, Poland) seek independent deterrence.

The Status of Israel

The strategic alliance between the United States and Israel is deeply institutionalized across decades of military, intelligence, and diplomatic cooperation.

• Bipartisan Stability: US foreign policy toward Israel remains a core pillar of its Middle East strategy, supported broadly across major political parties. A dismantlement or abandonment of this alliance is highly improbable under any standard geopolitical scenario, as it would fundamentally destabilize the regional balance of power.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

my comment:

The Democratic Party is going to do as I tell them, which is to stop funding Israel. So you are wrong, I heard recently that this has been decided as new policy.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Gemini 3:

The policy debate within the Democratic Party regarding military aid to Israel has shifted noticeably, reflecting growing divisions and an increasing push from certain factions to condition or restrict funding. However, the party has not adopted a blanket policy to completely stop funding Israel.

The current landscape of this debate reveals a complex internal dynamic:

• Internal Divisions: Recent legislative debates, such as those surrounding proposed amendments to spending bills, highlight a sharp split. While progressive members actively advocate for freezing or conditioning military aid based on humanitarian concerns, mainstream party leadership generally maintains support for the long-standing U.S.-Israel strategic alliance.

• Debate over Conditions: Rather than a total cessation of funding, the central discussion among many Democrats focuses on placing explicit humanitarian or human rights conditions on how U.S. military assistance is utilized.

• Bipartisan Frameworks: The baseline of foreign military financing continues to operate under multi-year agreements established across successive administrations, and complete defunding lacks the broad legislative consensus required to become official party platform policy.

While shifting public opinion and internal debates are changing the political calculations around foreign aid, the official platform remains a point of active contention rather than a settled decision to end the partnership.