I did actually realize in the 1970s -- when I was a teenager -- that American life seemed to produce an odd mixture of scholar, crackpot, and enthusiast. A lot of wealth was being generated so it was a simple matter to extend this idealism to the intellectual spheres. What you get is sort of interesting but as I said it is mostly silliness and crackpot. "Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski was born on March 28, 1928 in Warsaw, Poland." This man, Brzezinski, came to the New World and started his lucrative pontification career. He is the Cold Warrior, quintessential cold warrior man. Ashkenazi Jewish communism came alive in 1917 in Russia, and Brzezinski came of age just when things were really tense between the United States of America and the Soviet Union. I am not an expert on this guy but it really does appear that he wanted to update the British geographer and geopolitican Halford J. Mackinder. 

Britain certainly could demonstrate their mastery over the oceans and visit most if not all of the Earth with their gunships and vessels. This was high seas diplomacy, basically. Then do trade. It worked out great for several centuries, making Britain very wealthy, as wealthy as Rome was in its time. Maybe wealthier. 

I do concede that America's role was to force the Soviet Union into submission and to bring "economic development" to every corner of a very undeveloped world. This is very expensive, however. Thankfully, it has been achieved to some degree, and Brzezinski can at least be given a little credit for endorsing this goal. It was a lofty one but he was on to it. There were a lot of Jewish socialists and communists in the United States -- they praised the Soviet Union incessantly and excitedly -- and they did not like Brzezinski and called him basically a fascist. I never talked to Brzezinski but I tried a few times to see if he would do an interview. He refused. Not surprising. It's because he was fundamentally a crackpot. 

France is being weakened and destroyed, and that's because there's some 200,000 Ashkenazi Jews and 360,000 Sephardi Jews in France, most of them in Paris. Ashkenazi Jews destroyed Russia with "Soviet communism" and Ashkenazi Jews [there are almost 8 million in the United States] are clearly succeeding at weakening and destroying the United States. Rapidly growing debt and generous "transfer payments"; inviting hordes [many millions] of mestizos and other Third World immigrants who will be the majority of the population in 20-25 years; expensive and long-running wars in the Middle East; onerous regulations on business; promotion of a revolting and very dysfunctional culture. This is America, it was not like this in the 1970s. America was pretty cool in the 1970s. We went to the Moon and invented the internet. 

Promoting the USA as another Mackinder actor in Eurasia is pretty much a joke. It's not persuasive. American natural resources, namely crude oil, do not support this intervention. America as a nation of dark-skinned Third World immigrants and corrupt and criminal Ashkenazi Jews does not really inspire anyone. Everyone around the world is puzzled and if they are not puzzled they are probably laughing. 

Brzezinski is a crackpot [he died May 26, 2017]. NATO did not obviously need to be brought to the border of Russia. Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger were both vocal admirers of my ideas and work, and they would probably agree with me, totally. Kissinger is 98 years old, he does not return my calls, which is a shame. His Ashkenazi Jewish ego ultimately comes from a very profound insecurity. Kissinger is a little pompous but I always found his thoughts reasonably intelligent. He offered effusive praise of my ideas. Again, the Mackinder argument is brilliant but it really only applies to the British Isles. America, in the Western Hemisphere, cannot really ever become a permanent and powerful actor in the Mackinder Heartland otherwise called Eurasia. 

I have published below an image of a book review of The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives (1997). If you are not really familiar with the book and its thesis this will give you a modest introduction to it.